{"id":215750,"date":"2025-12-28T21:48:16","date_gmt":"2025-12-28T20:48:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/?p=215750"},"modified":"2026-02-25T20:04:25","modified_gmt":"2026-02-25T19:04:25","slug":"lifting-conservatory-attachment-when-is-it-possible","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/lifting-conservatory-attachment-when-is-it-possible\/","title":{"rendered":"Lifting Conservatory Attachment: When Is It Possible?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A Practical Guide Through Legal Grounds and Case Law<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Introduction<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Imagine: you suddenly receive notice that your bank account, car, or even your home has been attached. A creditor claims you owe them money and has obtained permission from the court to ‘freeze’ your assets as security. This is called conservatory attachment – a powerful legal instrument that protects creditors against the risk that their debtors will make their assets disappear before a judge has ruled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But what if the attachment was wrongfully imposed? What if the claim for which the attachment was imposed is completely incorrect, or if the attachment is heavier than necessary? In this comprehensive guide, we take you through the possibilities for lifting a conservatory attachment. We discuss the legal grounds, the role of the judge, relevant case law<\/a>, and provide practical tips for both attachees and legal advisors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is this relevant? <\/strong>Conservatory attachment can have far-reaching consequences. A blocked bank account can prevent you from paying your rent or mortgage. Attachment of business assets can shut down your enterprise. And attachment of a home can have great emotional impact. Therefore, it is crucial to know when and how you can defend yourself against wrongful or disproportionate attachment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. What Is Conservatory Attachment? A Brief Refresher<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Before we address the lifting, it is good to briefly consider what conservatory attachment actually entails and why it exists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Function of Conservatory Attachment<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Conservatory attachment is a provisional measure that enables a creditor to attach goods of their debtor even before there is a final judgment on the claim. The purpose is to prevent the debtor from selling, giving away, or otherwise making their assets unreachable for recovery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Example: <\/strong>Supplier A has outstanding invoices with customer B for \u20ac50,000. A fears that B is in financial trouble and will soon sell their business inventory. A can then request permission from the preliminary relief judge to impose conservatory attachment on B’s inventory. If the judge grants this permission, the inventory is ‘frozen’ until the case regarding the claim has been definitively decided.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Downside: Risk of Abuse<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Although conservatory attachment is a legitimate legal remedy, there is a risk of abuse. A creditor can have an attachment imposed based on a claim that later proves unfounded. Or the attachment is much larger than necessary for the amount of the claim. In such cases, the attachee can suffer serious damage: a blocked bank account, inability to conduct business, reputational damage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Therefore, the legislator has built in safeguards: the attachee can go to court and request lifting of the attachment. We discuss that possibility in this blog.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. The Legal Basis: Article 705 DCCP as Compass<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

The core of the lifting of conservatory attachment is found in Article 705 Dutch Code of Civil Procedure (DCCP)<\/strong>. This article is the legal compass for everyone dealing with the question of whether an attachment should remain in place or be lifted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Article 705 paragraph 1 DCCP provides that the preliminary relief judge can lift the attachment at the request of any interested party. This means that not only the attachee themselves, but also third parties who have an interest in lifting (for example, a third-party attachee with whom the attachment was imposed) can file a lifting request.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Paragraph 2 of Article 705 DCCP then lists four specific grounds on which lifting can be pronounced. Let us discuss these four grounds extensively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2.1 Procedural Defect: When the Procedure Is Invalid<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The first ground for lifting concerns procedural defects in imposing the attachment. Conservatory attachment has strict formal requirements, and if these are not met, this can lead to nullity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Important formal requirements are:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  • \u2022 The attaching party must have obtained prior permission from the preliminary relief judge (unless it concerns attachment by virtue of an authentic or enforceable title)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • \u2022 The permission order must contain the legally prescribed elements, such as the nature of the claim and the amount<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • \u2022 The attachment writ (the minutes of attachment) must meet certain formal requirements<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • \u2022 For some forms of attachment, the main case must be filed within a certain period<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

    Practice Example: <\/strong>The attaching party imposes attachment without prior permission from the court, while they do not have an authentic or executory title. Or: the permission order does not clearly describe the basis of the claim. In both cases, there is a procedural defect that can lead to lifting of the attachment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Note: <\/strong>Not every procedural defect automatically leads to lifting. It must concern a defect in requirements given on pain of nullity. The law indicates which formal requirements are so essential that violation leads to nullity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    2.2 Invalidity of the Claim: Is the Claim Justified?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The second and perhaps most common ground for lifting is the invalidity of the underlying claim. If the claim for which attachment was imposed is invalid, the attachment has no right to exist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    But note: the bar is high. <\/strong>The law speaks of summary evidence of invalidity. This means that upon a first, global assessment it must already be clear that the claim will not hold up. The judge does not conduct a complete investigation into the claim – that happens in the main proceedings – but assesses whether the claim is evidently untenable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    When is a claim summarily invalid?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    • \u2022 The claim is already time-barred<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • \u2022 The claim has already been fully satisfied (and this is easy to demonstrate)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • \u2022 There is evidently no legal basis for the claim<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • \u2022 The attaching party bases their claim on facts they themselves have already acknowledged as incorrect<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      Practice Example: <\/strong>A creditor imposes attachment for a claim of \u20ac100,000 under an alleged agreement. However, the attachee demonstrates that no agreement was ever concluded and that the creditor acknowledged this in earlier correspondence. In such a case, the judge can summarily rule that the claim is invalid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Case law makes clear that doubt must be interpreted in favor of the attaching party. If there are still questions that can only be answered in the main proceedings, the attachment is in principle maintained (see among others ECLI:NL:RBROT:2019:1824).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      2.3 Unnecessariness of the Attachment: Is It Proportionate?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      The third ground concerns the unnecessariness of the attachment. Even if the claim itself could well exist, the attachment can still be lifted if it is unnecessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      When is attachment unnecessary?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        \n
      • \u2022 The attachee has sufficient other recoverable assets that are easily accessible to the attaching party<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      • \u2022 The attached amount is much higher than the claim (disproportionality)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      • \u2022 Attachment has been imposed on goods essential for the attachee’s business operations, while other recovery possibilities exist<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      • \u2022 The attaching party has meanwhile already obtained other security that is sufficient<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

        Practice Example: <\/strong>A creditor imposes attachment for a claim of \u20ac20,000 on a property worth \u20ac400,000, while the attachee also has a bank account with a balance of \u20ac50,000 on which attachment could also have been imposed. The judge can rule that the attachment on the property is unnecessary, because recovery on the bank account provides ample security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        2.4 Security: An Alternative to Lifting<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

        The fourth ground specifically applies to monetary claims: the attachee can have the attachment lifted by providing sufficient security for the amount of the claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        What is sufficient security?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Sufficient security means that the attaching party has guaranteed recovery if their claim is ultimately granted. Examples of suitable security are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \n
        • \u2022 Deposit of the amount (plus interest and costs) in custody with the court or a notary<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        • \u2022 A bank guarantee<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        • \u2022 A surety from a creditworthy guarantor<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        • \u2022 Pledging of liquid securities or savings<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

          3. The Role of the Attachee: Burden of Pleading and Proof<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

          A crucial principle in lifting conservatory attachment is that the attachee bears the burden of pleading and proof. This means that it is up to the attachee to present facts and circumstances justifying lifting, and to make these plausible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          What Does This Mean in Practice?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

          The attachee cannot suffice with simply disputing the claim or the attachment. They must come forward with concrete arguments and, where possible, evidence. The Supreme Court has repeatedly confirmed this principle (see among others ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1074 and ECLI:NL:HR:2021:273).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Examples of good substantiation:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            \n
          • \u2022 When invoking procedural defect: pointing out the specific defect in the permission order or attachment writ, with reference to the relevant legal articles<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • \u2022 When invoking invalidity: submitting evidence showing that the claim has been satisfied, time-barred, or otherwise unfounded<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • \u2022 When invoking unnecessariness: demonstrating that other recovery possibilities exist, or that the attachment is disproportionately heavy<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • \u2022 When providing security: making a concrete offer with justification why this security is sufficient<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

            4. The Balancing of Interests: The Heart of the Decision<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

            In almost every lifting procedure, the balancing of interests plays a crucial role. The judge must weigh whether the attaching party’s interest in maintaining the attachment outweighs the attachee’s interest in lifting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            The Interest of the Attaching Party<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

            The attaching party has an interest in maintaining the attachment to safeguard their security for recovery. This interest is particularly great when:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \n
            • \u2022 There are indications that the attachee is trying to withdraw their assets from recovery<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            • \u2022 The attachee has little other recoverable assets<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            • \u2022 There is a risk that the attachee’s assets will rapidly decline in value<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            • \u2022 The claim still needs to be established in main proceedings that could take years<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

              The Interest of the Attachee<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

              The attachee has an interest in the attachment being lifted, because the attachment hinders them in their daily life or business operations. This interest is particularly great when:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                \n
              • \u2022 The attachment puts the attachee in serious financial problems<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • \u2022 The attachment seriously impedes or even makes business operations impossible<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • \u2022 The attachment has been imposed on a primary necessity of life such as the only home<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • \u2022 The attachment leads to reputational damage<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • \u2022 The value of the attached goods is disproportionate to the claim<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                5. Case Law: Important Principles from Jurisprudence<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

                The law provides the framework, but its interpretation happens in case law. Below we discuss some important jurisprudential principles that have been developed over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                5.1 The Provisional Nature of the Judgment<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                A lifting procedure is a preliminary relief proceeding, or an expedited procedure. The judge does not make a final ruling on whether the claim exists – that happens in the main proceedings. The judge only assesses summarily whether the claim is so evidently invalid that the attachment must be lifted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                This principle has been confirmed by the Court of Appeal of Arnhem-Leeuwarden in its judgment of April 23, 2024 (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2024:3510). The court considered that in a lifting procedure no complete investigation into the claim takes place, but only a provisional judgment is given on whether the claim is evidently unfounded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                5.2 Rejection in First Instance Is Not an Automatic Ground for Lifting<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                A striking and practically relevant principle is that the rejection of a claim in first instance does not automatically lead to lifting of conservatory attachment. This was decided by the Supreme Court in its judgment of April 17, 2015 (ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1074).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                As long as a legal remedy (appeal or cassation) is available against the rejection, the possibility remains that the claim will still be granted in a higher instance. The attachment then retains its safeguarding function in case the attaching party is ultimately vindicated on appeal or in cassation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                This principle was recently confirmed by the District Court of Central Netherlands in its judgment of September 17, 2024 (ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2024:4461).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                5.3 Cautiousness in Case of Doubt About the Claim<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                If the judge has doubts about the validity of the claim – for example, because both parties present plausible arguments – they will in principle be cautious with lifting the attachment. This cautiousness follows from the safeguarding function of the attachment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                The District Court of Rotterdam formulated this principle clearly in its judgment of March 13, 2019 (ECLI:NL:RBROT:2019:1824): when there is no summary evidence of the invalidity of the claim, the judge must be cautious with lifting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                6. Procedural Aspects: How Do You Request Lifting?<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

                If you want to request lifting of conservatory attachment, it is important to follow the correct procedure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                A request for lifting conservatory attachment is handled in preliminary relief proceedings. This means you must have a preliminary relief summons served requesting the lifting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Competent court: <\/strong>The preliminary relief judge of the court where the attachment was imposed is in principle competent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Urgency: <\/strong>In preliminary relief proceedings, the requirement is that there is an urgent interest. With conservatory attachment, this urgent interest is usually present.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                7. Practical Tips for Attachees<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

                Are you facing conservatory attachment and considering requesting lifting? Then the following tips are relevant:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Tip 1: React Quickly, But Don’t Rush<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                Conservatory attachment can have major consequences, so it is understandable that you want to react quickly. But do take the time to prepare your case properly. A poorly substantiated lifting request can be counterproductive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Tip 2: Substantiate Your Request Thoroughly<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                You bear the burden of pleading and proof. This means that mere assertion is insufficient – you must make your assertions plausible with concrete facts and evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Tip 3: Make the Balancing of Interests Concrete<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                The judge will always make a balancing of interests. Help the judge by making this balancing concrete in your substantiation. Not only explain that the attachment causes you damage, but quantify that damage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Tip 4: Consider Security as an Alternative<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                For monetary claims, providing security can be an effective route. By depositing the claimed amount in custody or providing a bank guarantee, you remove the attaching party’s main concern.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Tip 5: Engage a Specialist If Necessary<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                Attachment law is a specialized legal field. If major interests are at stake, it is wise to engage a lawyer with experience in attachment and enforcement law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                8. Special Situations and Exceptions<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

                In addition to the general rules of Article 705 DCCP, there are some special situations where specific rules apply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                8.1 Divorce and Registered Partnership<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                In case of divorce or dissolution of a registered partnership, special rules apply for conservatory attachment. These are found in Article 770b DCCP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                This article offers the possibility to have attachment imposed on the other spouse’s goods during divorce proceedings, to secure payment in the property settlement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                8.2 Attachment by the Tax Authorities<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                Conservatory attachment by the Tax Authorities (under the Tax Collection Act) has some special features. The Tax Authorities have broader powers than an ordinary creditor and in many cases do not need prior permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                For lifting tax attachment, the same legal grounds apply in principle, but the judge takes into account the public interest of tax collection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Conclusion<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

                Conservatory attachment is an intrusive legal remedy that protects creditors against loss of recovery, but which can also have significant consequences for the person whose goods are attached. The legislator has therefore created a balanced system whereby the attachment can be lifted if there are good grounds for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                The four legal grounds – procedural defect, invalidity of the claim, unnecessariness of the attachment, and provision of security – offer attachees various points of attack to defend themselves against wrongful or disproportionate attachment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                At the same time, the bar is not low. The attachee bears the burden of pleading and proof, and the judge only assesses summarily whether the claim is evidently invalid or the attachment unnecessary. In case of doubt, the attachment will usually be maintained, because it must be able to retain its safeguarding function until the main proceedings are completed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                The balancing of interests forms the heart of every lifting procedure. The judge weighs the attaching party’s interest in security for recovery against the attachee’s interest in being able to dispose of their goods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Case law has further clarified the legal grounds. Important principles are the provisional nature of the judgment in a lifting procedure, the rule that rejection in first instance does not automatically lead to lifting, the cautiousness in case of doubt about the claim, and the increasing importance of proportionality and effectiveness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                For practice, this means that an attachee who wants to request lifting must prepare their case thoroughly. A well-substantiated request, provided with concrete facts and evidence, and with attention to the balancing of interests, has the best chance of success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Do you have questions about conservatory attachment or are you considering requesting lifting?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Then contact a specialized lawyer in attachment and enforcement law. An initial legal analysis can help you determine your position and choose the best strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                References<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

                Legislation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                  \n
                • \u2022 Article 705 Dutch Code of Civil Procedure – Lifting of conservatory attachment<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                • \u2022 Article 770b Dutch Code of Civil Procedure – Conservatory attachment in divorce<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                  Case Law<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                    \n
                  • \u2022 Supreme Court April 17, 2015, ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1074<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • \u2022 Supreme Court February 26, 2021, ECLI:NL:HR:2021:273<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • \u2022 Court of Appeal Arnhem-Leeuwarden April 23, 2024, ECLI:NL:GHARL:2024:3510<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • \u2022 District Court Central Netherlands September 17, 2024, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2024:4461<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • \u2022 District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant December 21, 2020, ECLI:NL:RBZWB:2020:6455<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • \u2022 District Court Rotterdam March 13, 2019, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2019:1824<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                    A Practical Guide Through Legal Grounds and Case Law Introduction Imagine: you suddenly receive notice that your bank account, car, or even your home has been attached. A creditor claims you owe them money and has obtained permission from the court to ‘freeze’ your assets as security. This is called conservatory attachment – a powerful […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":215764,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[6397,6404],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-215750","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-corporate-law","category-it-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215750","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215750"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215750\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":259590,"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215750\/revisions\/259590"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/215764"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215750"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215750"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/highpowerlasertherapy.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215750"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}